Social Media Ideas for Peer Review

Hospital peer review needs recusal rules, not assumptions

Hospital peer review is one of medicine’s most important mechanisms for protecting patients and maintaining professional standards. Physicians possess the clinical expertise necess...

AI in peer review should be a second reader, not a judge

I have often wondered why, among three reviews of the same biomedical research manuscript, one reviewer may dismiss nearly everything the authors have done, another may offer a mod...

Discovery Stack Pilot demonstrates the feasibility and outcomes of a scientist-designed peer-review model that separates...

by Maureen A. McGargill, Beiyun C. Liu, Michael S. Kuhns, Daniel Mucida, Isabella Rauch, Lauren B. Rodda, Meghan A. Koch, Hugo Gonzalez Velozo, Ken Cadwell, Tanya S. Freedman, Tiff...

Excellence in Peer Review

Across all the BES journals, we’ve seen a marked rise in submissions over the last year, highlighting the strong reputation and reach of our journals and published articles. Howeve...

Health Care Quality Improvement Act Immunity: How Thorough Peer Review Protects Hospitals from Damages Claims

How to run private fund due diligence like a reviewer

I have reviewed manuscripts for more than thirty journals. The habit is always the same. Skip the abstract. Go straight to the methods, because that is where the paper either holds...

Sakana AI’s LLM Peer Review System Catches 73% of Core-Claim Errors

Sakana AI’s TMLR paper introduces Multi-Layered Review, a 3-agent Claude-based reviewer, and a 1,164-error Contradiction Benchmark. MLR caught 73.43% of core-claim errors, versus 1...

Running the Recursive Trust Benchmark: Your First Reviewer Pilot

<figure data-wp-context="{"imageId":"6aaee751d8864"}" data-wp-interactive="core/image" data-wp-key="6aaee751d8864&qu...

When Two AI Reviewers Agree: Building Assurance Quorums Without False Independence

<figure data-wp-context="{"imageId":"6aaf34eb9eb69"}" data-wp-interactive="core/image" data-wp-key="6aaf34eb9eb69&qu...

Scholastica, Law Reviews, And Gatekeepers Of Academic Prestige

The promise of a single method of sending up a draft law review article is increasingly in jeopardy. The post Scholastica, Law Reviews, And Gatekeepers Of Academic Prestige appeare...

Tag1 Insights: Human in the Middle: The Review Is Still yours

How Tag1 Reviews Code with AI covered the tools Tag1 built to put AI into the PR review process. This post shows the pattern: AI drafts your whole review into GitHub pending review...

APS Submits Comments the NIH’s Proposed Changes to Peer Review.

APS recently submitted comments on the NIH’s proposed changes to peer review based off of a working group recommendation. The proposed changes would hide the numerical score a gran...

Шесть миллиардов прогонов ради одной галочки: как устроено ревью научного софта на GitHub

Последние месяцы я рецензирую научный софт для JOSS, Journal of Open Source Software. Это настоящий рецензируемый журнал с редколлегией, только статья в нём короткая, около тысячи...

Poll results on sending revised mss back out for review

Recently, I polled readers on their views as editors (or would-be editors) on sending revised mss back out for review. Here are the results! tl;dr: Interesting range of views out t...