Search fresh public links, source activity, and ready-to-use post angles for Fourth Amendment.
Fresh curated links around Fourth Amendment are collected here so marketers can spot useful updates and turn timely ideas into posts faster.
Recent items include:
Recent curated links from global sources. Generate one free draft from any story, then use SocialBu to schedule and refine your content calendar.
A new Ninth Circuit ruling raises a number of hard issues.
Can police search your car without permission? Learn how the 4th Amendment protects drivers from unreasonable vehicle searches.
Cops keep carving out tech exceptions to the Fourth Amendment—and courts are giving them their blessing.
The first post-Chatrie ruling on the question.
The automated license plate reader system is “a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance," says a federal judge.
The case included controversial roadside surveillance cameras.
Federal appeals courts differ on whether the Fourth Amendment protects your cellphone at the border. A Texas lawyer is asking the Supreme Court to settle it.
Gun owners should be paying attention to how police use gunfire microphones in conjunction with license plate cameras.
Jason Koebler / 404 Media: A US judge rules an officer's use of Flock to search a car's license plate was a form of “indiscriminate mass surveillance”, and violated the Fourth Amen...
thus deepening a circuit split. (Note that strip searches are generally allowed when and if the arrestee is placed in the general population of the jail.)
From the great-but-this-is-the-wrong-circuit-for-this dept. The post Federal Court Says Flock ALPR Database Searches Require A Warrant appeared first on Above the Law.
New Hampshire school officials have admitted that their search of student Jack Harrington’s truck was unconstitutional. The agreed judgment says lawful gun ownership did not create...
Judge- Okla. deputy's warrantless license plate reader search violated Fourth Amendment
A recent lecture.
Defenders of Flock-style surveillance systems argue that people “have no reasonable expectation of privacy in public.” They're wrong.
The Supreme Court recognized that cellphones were different in Riley v. California. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, with both JFK airport, among others, within its jurisdictio...
The Virginia Court of Appeals reversed the circuit court's suppression of evidence after police had reasonable suspicion to detain Charlie Ray Surida Jr. in Alexandria. The post Se...
Going to the doctor, casino, or a lawyer's office is nobody's business but the American who is doing it, an Oklahoma judge has declared.The judge said that when a police officer us...
SAF scored a major win in Harrington v. Crawford after school officials admitted searching Jack Harrington’s vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The search was based sole...
Appeals court rules First Amendment applies to recording police activity in public
A federal judge ruled that a sheriff’s deputy violated a woman’s Fourth Amendment rights when using Flock to search for her license plate without a warrant.
State and federal courts have almost uniformly ruled that searches of ALPR databases do not implicate the Fourth Amendment.
A federal appeals court will hear an appeal about Flock cameras in a Virginia case claiming Fourth Amendment rights violations.
Use SocialBu to discover ideas, generate post drafts, and schedule them across your social channels.