Social Media Ideas for Civil Rights Compliance Plan

EEOC’s Updated Strategic Plan for 2026-2030- Discrimination Prevention + Remedy Aligned with Current NEP Priorities

Wisconsin Extends Civil Rights Compliance Period Through 2028

The Wisconsin Department of Health Services (“DHS”) recently announced that it is extending the current civil rights compliance period for recipients of federal financial assistanc...

Federal Certification and Contracting Requirements for Colleges and Universities: A Year in Review

Over the past year, the federal government has moved beyond broad policy statements concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and into the operational mechanics of federal...

Federal Court Vacates DEI Conditions, Compliance Certification Connected to HHS, HUD Grants

Final Rules Dismantle Civil Rights Protections for Minorities, Women, Individuals with Disabilities, and Veterans

Building Your 2027 Compliance Work Plan and Questions Every Compliance Officer Should Ask

State Imperatives to Protect Civil Rights for All

States need independent agencies with jurisdiction to enforce their residents’ rights so the valuation of those rights are evenhanded and not subject to political will. The post S...

HR Compliance Training: Requirements, Best Practices, and Tracking

There's no single federal law requiring general "HR compliance training." What actually exists is a patchwork: federal anti-discrimination law that rewards training without technic...

California CRD Pay Data Reporting Enforcement Actions Highlight Risks for Nonfilers

As the California pay data reporting requirements continue to intensify, two new enforcement actions filed by the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) serve as a stark reminder...

Deloitte to pay $21.5M to settle claims its DEI programs violated federal civil rights law

“Government contractors cannot reward or penalize employees based on race or sex,” the attorney general said.

ABA and FWA: Compliance Best Practices

The 30-Day Clock on CC-305: What Federal Contractors Need to Do Now

If you run hiring for a federal contractor, you have a compliance change on your desk this month that deserves more attention than a routine policy update. On August 21, OFCCP publ...

Why HR Compliance Education Matters Now More Than Ever

Stay ahead of changing employment laws with HR compliance education that helps employers reduce risk and make informed workforce decisions.

Proposed Section 1.501(c)(3)-2: Re-Evaluating Racial Nondiscrimination Requirements for Private School Tax Exemptions

Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Racial Nondiscrimination in Private Schools, REG-119986-25, RIN 1545-BS05, FR Doc. 2026-181...

Building an AI Governance Program That Satisfies Both DOJ and SEC Compliance Expectations

The EEOC Is Not Losing Its Religion: Enforcement Focus on Discrimination

Proposed IRS Regulations on Affirmative Action, DEI Threaten 501(c)(3) Status for Private Schools

AI Employment Law: Employer Liability and Compliance Guide

Introduction: AI Risk No Longer Stops at Hiring Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are now part of the full employment lifecycle for many employers, not just at the applicant scree...

Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Shift: OFCCP Ends Disability Self-ID and Utilization Requirements

The Compliance Form Is Gone, The Liability Isn’t

Last month I wrote about the thirty-day window OFCCP handed federal contractors to stop using Form CC-305. I framed it as a workflow problem: find the form in your applicant tracki...

NOTICE

The City of Bluffton in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of T...

NOTICE

The City of Bluffton in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of T...

Compliance legal Register

EEOC asks judge to assist in probe of San Francisco government’s DEI trainings

The City and County of San Francisco allegedly required attendance of a seminar series featuring “derogatory and vitriolic statements” about White people and White women.