Search fresh public links, source activity, and ready-to-use post angles for Center For Science And Culture.
Fresh curated links around Center for Science and Culture are collected here so marketers can spot useful updates and turn timely ideas into posts faster.
Recent items include:
Recent curated links from global sources. Generate one free draft from any story, then use SocialBu to schedule and refine your content calendar.
Not only does the space enable regular study, but also it hosts ID discussion forums, faculty or departmental workshops, and club training. Source
Dr. Alistair McKitterick explains how intelligent design and natural theology provide a robust framework that challenges modern scientific materialism. Source
I welcome Dr. Casey Luskin to a new and improved podcast studio for a sit-down, in-person conversation! Source
On March 26–28, 1992, scientists and philosophers assembled at Southern Methodist University for an event whose title posed a provocative question. Source
Whether learning from a professor or chatting with a fellow student over coffee, Martin never ran into anyone to challenge his naturalistic worldview. Source
The lack of scrutiny and skepticism by professional academics reflects a crisis of its own. Source
In C. W. Howell’s mind, intelligent design is still recovering from the Dover trial, and if there’s evidence to the contrary, he doesn’t want to see it. Source
As you might have noticed, the critics of intelligent design I’m discussing here aren’t atheists or materialists. Source
The junk DNA paradigm shift is a good example of how an intelligent design framework can serve as a productive guide to scientific research. Source
by Victor Joecks at CDN - Most higher education institutions don’t adhere to the theory of evolution. Sure, they say they believe in it, but look at their actions. In recent weeks...
It’s quite a chain of errors, from the ACLU to Judge Jones to C. W. Howell. Each makes it worse than the one before. Source
To speak of a “paradigm shift” on Junk DNA is another way of saying that the debate is over and ID won. Source
As author C. W. Howell puts it, various ID proponents have sometimes committed the thought crime of “doubting the science consensus outside evolution." Source
Snowballs start small. But they grow steadily over time, and after a while they really start to get large and pick up speed. Source
Tucker Carlson has called for everyone in Israel to have a DNA test, to sort out the real from the false of “Abram's descendants.” Source
There are a lot of commenters refuting arguments that Stephen Meyer never made. What he is offering is what philosophers of science call an abductive inference. Source
After it had been announced on campus, Jerry Coyne, a prominent Darwinian biologist at the University of Chicago, tried to talk Leo into disinviting me. Source
I want to be fair to Howell, but I also want to be fair to my colleagues who have worked hard developing and publishing new ID arguments over the past 20 years. Source
Wolfgang Smith’s excitement about conservation of complex specified information or specified complexity was not widely shared. Source
The headline is glaringly inaccurate. It says, “University press removes book about intelligent design for misquoting ID proponent.” Source
I conclude my conversation with Dr. Casey Luskin about his critique of a recent book from New York University Press, by C. W. Howell. Source
"There are tales readily believed by scholars, 'in order to live' — because the ideological campus discourse is beyond question." Source
When Pope Pius IX awarded St. George Jackson Mivart a doctorate, he was not by implication casting his imprimatur or approval on evolution. Source
Naturalism is like a Pandora’s box in that all of scientific explanation must be kept inside it. Source
Use SocialBu to discover ideas, generate post drafts, and schedule them across your social channels.