Search fresh public links, source activity, and ready-to-use post angles for Casey Luskin.
Fresh curated links around Casey Luskin are collected here so marketers can spot useful updates and turn timely ideas into posts faster.
Recent items include:
Recent curated links from global sources. Generate one free draft from any story, then use SocialBu to schedule and refine your content calendar.
I welcome Dr. Casey Luskin to a new and improved podcast studio for a sit-down, in-person conversation! Source
To speak of a “paradigm shift” on Junk DNA is another way of saying that the debate is over and ID won. Source
I want to be fair to Howell, but I also want to be fair to my colleagues who have worked hard developing and publishing new ID arguments over the past 20 years. Source
It’s quite a chain of errors, from the ACLU to Judge Jones to C. W. Howell. Each makes it worse than the one before. Source
Snowballs start small. But they grow steadily over time, and after a while they really start to get large and pick up speed. Source
In C. W. Howell’s mind, intelligent design is still recovering from the Dover trial, and if there’s evidence to the contrary, he doesn’t want to see it. Source
I conclude my conversation with Dr. Casey Luskin about his critique of a recent book from New York University Press, by C. W. Howell. Source
Whether learning from a professor or chatting with a fellow student over coffee, Martin never ran into anyone to challenge his naturalistic worldview. Source
As you might have noticed, the critics of intelligent design I’m discussing here aren’t atheists or materialists. Source
The headline is glaringly inaccurate. It says, “University press removes book about intelligent design for misquoting ID proponent.” Source
One positive aspect: Howell rightly observes that some other would-be histories of ID, especially those by written by critics, are “polemical” and “activist.” Source
After it had been announced on campus, Jerry Coyne, a prominent Darwinian biologist at the University of Chicago, tried to talk Leo into disinviting me. Source
As author C. W. Howell puts it, various ID proponents have sometimes committed the thought crime of “doubting the science consensus outside evolution." Source
On March 26–28, 1992, scientists and philosophers assembled at Southern Methodist University for an event whose title posed a provocative question. Source
The lack of scrutiny and skepticism by professional academics reflects a crisis of its own. Source
Evidence for intelligent design in nature may be clear to you, while other matters relating to faith remain far more perplexing. Source
Charles Thaxton, along with Walter Bradley and Roger Olsen, wrote what arguably was the first official book of the intelligent design movement. Source
A sincere apology, not merely acceding to the will of NYU’s legal team, would be "honorable." Source
The junk DNA paradigm shift is a good example of how an intelligent design framework can serve as a productive guide to scientific research. Source
Dillahunty contended that the biological information coded in DNA isn’t really information at all but only analogous to it. Try to follow this word salad. Source
True, our ID argument does depend in part upon critical assessments of the causal adequacy of materialistic explanations for the origin of DNA information. Source
Naturalism is like a Pandora’s box in that all of scientific explanation must be kept inside it. Source
Dr. Shedinger, in Dr. Howell’s own field, could have saved him some trouble by looking at his scholarship more carefully than Howell’s own academic reviewers. Source
There are a lot of commenters refuting arguments that Stephen Meyer never made. What he is offering is what philosophers of science call an abductive inference. Source
Use SocialBu to discover ideas, generate post drafts, and schedule them across your social channels.