Tort – Jury’s zero-damages verdict for inmate plaintiff affirmed
Where the jury found for the plaintiff on liability, but awarded no damages, its award was affirmed. The evidence was sufficient for the jury to conclude that he suffered no […] Th...
Search fresh public links, source activity, and ready-to-use post angles for Albritton V. Commonwealth.
Fresh curated links around AlBritton v. Commonwealth are collected here so marketers can spot useful updates and turn timely ideas into posts faster.
Recent items include:
Recent curated links from global sources. Generate one free draft from any story, then use SocialBu to schedule and refine your content calendar.
Where the jury found for the plaintiff on liability, but awarded no damages, its award was affirmed. The evidence was sufficient for the jury to conclude that he suffered no […] Th...
After his Alford plea, the circuit court convicted Baltazar Albear Jr. of abduction by force or intimidation. Before sentencing, Albear twice moved to withdraw his guilty plea; the...
Where the testimony of two Commonwealth witnesses was not inherently incredible and unworthy of belief, the defendant’s convictions for first-degree murder, attempted malicious wou...
Where the defendant contended the Commonwealth struck approximately 50 percent of the Black jurors from the panel, and argued the Commonwealth did not provide a sufficient, neutral...
Where the jury sent a note that they were deadlocked, and that they sought direction from the court on “[w]here” to “go from here,” the trial court did not abuse […] The post Crimi...
Where a man moved to have his state sentence suspended following his release from federal custody, but the circuit court did not issue a final judgment within 60 days from […] The...
Where the district court sufficiently considered the defendant’s mitigation evidence, provided a sufficient explanation for its sentence and did not impose a substantively unreason...
Where the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the government’s proximate cause burden when a defendant is charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 242, which makes it illegal f...
Where a man convicted of aggravated malicious wounding and shooting or stabbing another in the commission of a felony argued the trial court erred by not continuing his trial, beca...
Attorney General Russell Coleman filed briefs in support of the "substantial proof" presented at both of the Lawson trials, saying the evidence provided more than enough proof of t...
Where the circuit court declined to address the defendant’s First Amendment overbreadth challenge to a criminal statute, and did not rule on whether the statute was unconstitutiona...
Where the district court granted a defendant’s writ of habeas corpus by accepting arguments already rejected by the state postconviction court, it erred. The state postconviction c...
Where the evidence was sufficient to conclude the defendant physically abused the two-year-old child he was supposed to care for, his convictions for malicious wounding and child a...
Defendant Peewee Carmelo Martinez’s motion to suppress evidence was denied by the WDVA court, citing sufficient nexus and the good-faith exception. The post Criminal – Defendant’s...
Where the government initially argued the defendant’s four prior convictions qualified him for an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, which requires three predic...
Where the evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant stole $26,000 from another man’s vehicle, his grand larceny conviction was affirmed. Background The trial court convi...
Where an officer fatally shot a man who repeatedly failed to obey commands while holding a weapon, his use of lethal force was objectively reasonable. The post Civil Rights – Offic...
Where a man filed a writ of coram nobis eight years after obtaining the information upon which it relied, and he failed to identify errors at trial that rise to […] The post Crimin...
Where the defendant argued his attorney’s representation posed an unwaivable conflict, but his motion for a new trial was filed too late, and he repeatedly consented to the attorne...
Where the defendant argued for the first time on appeal that his sentencing range was improperly calculated, because it assumed he was convicted under the Uniform Controlled Substa...
Where a man was convicted of murdering the victim, concealing her body, robbery and abduction, and there was sufficient evidence to support these convictions, they were affirmed. B...
Attorneys for a Clark County man charged with murder want the case against him dismissed, saying his constitutional rights were violated.
Use SocialBu to discover ideas, generate post drafts, and schedule them across your social channels.